If you're an obsessive news-reader like me, then by now you should be entirely sick of reading about Bush and Harken energy (especially on Salon, which seems to enjoy driving topics into the ground nowadays). While it warms my heart to see the Administration struggle to explain this unfortunate turn of events, this scandal is far less fun than anything Clinton ever got himself into (although, unlike Bush, Clinton wasn't actually guilty of the first fifteen or so).
Luckily, The New Republic gives a wonderfully clear summary of the known facts, leading up to the conclusion that we should all make: "More important than whether Bush is guilty of insider trading, his Harken past shows him to be either lazy, or stupid, or both." See, Bush claims that, as a member of Harken's audit committee, he wasn't made aware of the company's financial woes, nor of its questionable-at-best accounting techniques. So, either he's lying, which carries its own obvious consequences, or he's not, which confirms suspicions that he was an incompetent, slow-witted businessman.
A final point for those who insist that Bush, despite his father being President of the United States, is some sort of rugged, self-made man. Harken purchased a failing company, headed by Bush, that had purchased another failing company, also headed by Bush. Why would they do this? From Harken founder Phil Kendrick: "His name was George Bush. That was worth the money they paid him."